Monday, June 23, 2008

The Incredible Hulk

There are few things more pleasing than when a film surprises you with how damn competent it is, especially in this day and age when we've seen everything. There are several reasons this happens, including poor promotion, but it seems more impressive when it happens against poor speculation towards it's prospects, ala The Bourne Identity. That's why it was so pleasing to get a double-surprise of Ed Norton returning to form as a leading man in Hollywood, and to do it via a star/producer/co-writer vehicle in The Incredible Hulk.
Norton stars as proto-geek Bruce Banner, the man with the most conspicuous anger management problem on the planet. The film begins with a credit sequence that refreshes people on the "familiar"* origin of the Hulk in about a minute and a half (THANK YOU. This is how origins should be dealt with), and moves on to show Banner hiding out in Brazil, working as a janitor in a bottling plant, and studying with a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu master to defend himself and control his anger. What? I know, right? Not your typical superhero fare. This early sequence of the film showcases the honestly beautiful cinematography in the film (most notably a shot of the crowded city that circles up.....and up.....and up.....), and showcases Banner's plight in hiding, the consequences of not being able to maintain absolute control, and the general tragedy of being the Hulk very vividly. Meanwhile, General "Thunderbolt" Ross (William Hurt, phoning it in) is determined to catch the Hulk, and use him for his original purpose: as a bio-weapon, with the assistance of Royal Marine Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth). The crux of the plot revolves around Banner's determination to find a cure for the Hulk aided by the mysterious "Mr. Blue," and how his quest is opposed by Ross and his obsession with the Hulk.
Much has been made of the maligned (and rightfully so) 2004 Hulk film, and people were wondering if the franchise was cursed. How does this new version compare to the Ang Lee version? The answer is, very, very well. French director Louis Leterrier (The Transporter 2, Unleashed) handles directorial duties nicely, in a fast-moving, funny, and thoughtful popcorn film that makes it very easy to care about the protagonist. The script by proven Marvel adapter Zak Penn holds up well, especially the Norton-added references to the Hulk's universe, and a hard-to-miss reference to Captain America via the Super-Solider Serum. BUT, the easter eggs and references never get in the way of the plot, or story.
There was a lot I liked about this film that I hated about the first one. The Hulk gets his powers from gamma radiation, not sea-cucumber splicing. The Hulk talks. The Hulk fights a super-villain, not the Army the whole time, which leads to one small caveat: how stupid are these guys anyway? They spend millions of dollars pursuing the Hulk, and yet they can't figure out he's bullet-proof, so maybe they shouldn't waste any ammo lesser than, say, a Stinger missile on him? If I were a taxpayer in the Marvel Universe, I'd be pretty pissed off that they were spending all that money going after domestic "problems" like the Hulk, instead of Dr. Doom and his weapons of mass destruction. Screw diplomatic policy.
All in all, it's been a great year for comics at the multiplex. While not quite as good as Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk pretty much lives up to its name. I give it a 15 out of 22 on the 22 scale.

5 comments:

Mike said...

You suck, Blogspot. Learn to recognize italics, for God's sake.

CmdLuke said...

Nice review.

I pretty much agree with everything you said. I did like the hulk a bit better than iron man, I think mostly because it didn't waste any time with the origin story and jumped right into the meat of the hulk.

I love that marvel is making their own movies now. Its so great to see the different characters mingling in each others movies finally. =)
Hopefully they can settle their differences with Ed Norton so he will be back for the avengers movie.

Mike said...

Marvel Studios has kicked ass right out the gate....and good for them. Now only if DC can hope to keep up at this point....they've got one strong franchise, and one potentially ok one, the rest are in development hell. I think all they really need to get the ball rolling is a decent Flash movie.

Dr. Worm said...

Two thoughts:

First, why the beef with origin stories? I guess I can understand how they might be unexciting if you're already familiar with the origin, but if you're a comic novice like me, I think they make for the most relate-able (and still very entertaining fare).

Two, is this summer an aberration, or are comic book movies getting steadily better?

CmdLuke said...

I don't necisarily think that the origin story needs to be glossed over in every movie as it was in the incredible hulk. I think the hulk just did that to show that it is a totally different entity from the ang lee hulk. kind of a re-boot.
I think the origin is a good first movie for any comic book character. It introduces the character to the general public and helps people to identify with them.
As well as it is done well, ala the original spiderman.
The original batman handled the origin fairly well, i think, in more the form of flashbacks showing the character dealing with the impact of it.

I think that comic book movies got a great start up with the first couple x-men and spiderman movies. Then the studios started getting a bit lazy, i think. Now that marvel is much more heavily involved in the making of the films, they are incorporating the main thing that makes the books so good: the story.