Monday, July 28, 2008

The Dark Knight

The recent comic book movie boom, despite it's ubiquitousness and financial success, has a lot to answer for, as far as I'm concerned. Sure, quality has been fairly high this year, so far, but the level of storytelling generally misses the mark when most of the films are measured against the original source material. The X-Men movies gave us a cast of dozens, who were mostly poorly introduced and developed, and swapped scrappy little Wolverine for Clint Eastwood tall, good looking, get-them-gals-into-the-theater Wolverine. The Spider Man movies were more or less faithful to the stories, but somehow couldn't resist adding a thick layer of cheese to the material that was neither warranted or welcomed, in addition to bland, uninspiring casting choices for the two most important characters in the films. Superman Returns was almost a fine return to form, if it hadn't been so quiet and slavishly faithful to the old Richard Donner films. But then came The Dark Knight, Christopher Nolan's follow up to 2004's excellent Batman Begins, and I say, his masterpiece thus far.
The Dark Knight picks up directly from Batman Begins: Batman (Christian Bale) and Lieutenant Jim Gordon (Gary Oldman) are quickly changing Gotham, keeping the mob on the run and backing them into a corner. But, problems are still there: amateur copycat Batmen are popping up, giving Batman more to worry about when fighting crime. Also, an unpredictable criminal mastermind known as the Joker (Heath Ledger) has been making the scene, and offers his services to the mob to rid them of Batman. Add to the mix idealistic DA Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), who both helps and complicates matters by aligning himself with Batman and Gordon, and dating Rachel Dawes (Maggie Gyllenhal, ably replacing Katie Holmes from the first film). Things are going to get worse before they get better.....a hell of a lot worse.
It's been said that The Dark Knight is a writer's movie, and that's putting it mildly. TDK takes the standard script/act formula for a summer tentpole and smashes it to pieces. There are multiple story subtypes in the main theme, an unorthodox act structure, multiple climaxes (!), but Christopher and Jonathan Nolan make it all work. Nolan has acknowledged inspiration from Michael Mann's Heat, and it resembles that film in some ways (a high-profile bank robbery, archrivals, lots of attention to the supporting cast, really an ensemble piece at heart), but to say that it's a superhero version of Heat is selling it short. When I walked out of Batman Begins, my mind was reeling with all the possibilities that they could continue with. Nolan took all of those opportunities, and one or two I didn't think about. We see more of Batman, his tactical genius, his detective skills, and even him working during the day as Bruce Wayne, where Batman can't go. Gary Oldman's part is substantially expanded from the first film, as he gets to hit all the right notes for Gordon: hero cop, family man, Batman's greatest ally. As Harvey Dent, Aaron Eckhart nearly owns the picture for his portrayal as a man so inspiring that Bruce Wayne wonders if he could and should replace Batman as the hero Gotham City deserves. The film has a truly epic feel, yet the dialogue is pretty minimalist: I don't think there's a single wasted word in the script. There is no kid stuff to be had here: this is a superhero movie for adults, and it's tone exceeds other dark second acts (if they make a third.....) like The Empire Strikes Back and The Two Towers. The film is rated PG-13, but it felt R-Rated to me. A daring status quo is established at the end of the film that makes me want to see another to see how it will play out, if for no other reason.
The thing that got some extra interest for the picture, for better or worse, was Heath Ledger's tragic overdose earlier this year. Watching him in TDK only makes that sadder, because I had no idea how much potential he had. Had he not died, there would still be a lot of buzz about him because really, he's that good as the Joker. We see performances this incendiary only once in a great while. Robert Mitchum in Night of the Hunter. Peter O'Toole in The Ruling Class. Dennis Hopper in Blue Velvet. Geoffrey Rush in Quills. And Heath Ledger does that here. When the Joker is onscreen, there is not a second in which Ledger isn't conveying a very palpable sense of danger and chaos that Jack Nicholson couldn't convey with his nonthreatening Joker from Tim Burton's Batman. With his unkempt hair, strange makeup, and Chelsea grin, he disappears completely inside the character (isn't that what an actor's supposed to do anyway?) The Joker seen here is the closest we've seen to the comics in terms of his unpredictability, threat level, and criminal genius, but with a touch of added anarchy. Nolan and Ledger did a fine job indeed of pulling the garish Joker into the "real world" nicely. It should be noted that Ledger does not overpower any other actor in the film, IMHO: everybody does solid, careful work with characters less outlandish than the Joker. Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman, respectively reprising their roles as Alfred Pennyworth and Lucius Fox from the first film, get a lot done with very little screen time. If Alfred had a bigger role in this picture, I would say that Michael Caine deserved an Oscar nod for Best Supporting Actor. Honorable mention also goes to Eric Roberts, for his portrayal of smarmy mob boss Sal Moroni.
TDK is a summer movie in almost every sense of the definition: while a lot smarter than the typical summer movie, it's no less fun. The ante is upped with several major action sequences that far surpass the very competent, but much smaller in retrospect, Batman Begins. TDK whizzes along at a breakneck pace that makes the two and a half hour film feel much longer, without actually dragging. Multiple viewings are practically required to really absorb the story, and its subtleties. Despite that, TDK is easily the most satisfying film I've seen in years. And now, there's no looking back. Comic book movies have no excuses for playing it safe now that this film has raised the bar, and given us the crime epic that a character as great as Baman deserves. This formula can be easily applied to other existing franchises. I don't believe that Sam Raimi put Spider Man through the wringer half as much as he could have, and the character wouldn't (and shouldn't) react by simply crying and turning disco, either. Give us X-Men that are the misunderstood freaks who protect those who fear and hate them, instead of the really, really, really, good-looking mutants. I want an Iron Man movie heavy on the political/military intrigue, ala Tom Clancy. Throw Tony Stark's alcoholism into the mix ala Leaving Las Vegas, and you have something potentially very powerful indeed.
The only caveat I have with TDK (if you can even call it a problem) is that it's a pretty hard act to follow, even for a filmmaker as gifted as Christopher Nolan. Still, I believe that he is capable of it. After all, he just gave me the superhero film I've been waiting for for a very long time now. I had absurdly high expectations for TDK, and it met them handily. This movie is Best Picture nomination (if not outright deserving of the prize) good, no joke. This is genre filmmaking on a level never, ever seen before. Still, I hope that Christopher Nolan can pull off a third act that at least meets this one in quality, if not beats it. It's because of that hope that I give The Dark Knight a 21.5 on the 22 scale.

Memorable Lines:

The Joker: "You see, nobody panics when things go according to plan. Even if the plan is horrifying. If I told people that a gangbanger was going to get shot, or a busload of soldiers was going to get blown up, nobody would panic. Because it's all part of the plan. But tell people that one tiny little mayor is going to die and everyone loses their minds!"

Batman: "Why do you want to kill me?"
The Joker: "Kill you? I don't want to kill you! What would I do without you? Go back to ripping off mob dealers? No, no, you... you complete me."

Maroni's Mistress: "It's too loud in here, we can't hear each other talk."
Salvatore Maroni: "What makes you think I want to hear you talk?"

The Joker: "Do you wanna know why I use a knife? Guns are too quick. You can't savor all the...little..emotions. And..you see..in their last moments...people show you who they really are. So, in a way, I know your friends better than you ever did. Would you like to know which one of them were cowards?"

Harvey Dent: "The night is darkest just before the dawn. And I promise you, the dawn is coming."

11 comments:

CmdLuke said...

great review. Agree with everything. Got tickets last night to see it again on sunday in IMAX. Can't wait =)
The thing I really love about this new iteration of Batman is that they really aren't comic book movies. They break into a totally different category adding many layers of depth to the characters, stories and themes.

Dr. Worm said...

Needless to say, I'm amped to see this movie.

But I was also thinking: two summer movies recently cracked 20 on the -22 to 22 scale. Does that make this the best summer for movies ... ever? If last year was the depressingly materialistic summer of sequels, was this the year that Hollywood said, "We get it -- you want good movies"?

Clearly, Wall-E and The Dark Knight have set the bar in their respective genres, but I feel like this summer has had a decent wad of good movies (Iron Man, Indiana Jones, the new Hulk movie, heck even Kung Fu Panda got an 88% on the Tomatometer.

Am I overreacting, or is this really an abnormally good summer for movies?

Mike said...

This is definitely an exceptional summer for movies. WALL*E and The Dark Knight are "exceptional" films, and I would categorize Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk as "excellent". I have a strong feeling that Pineapple Express will be really good too. But, it's pretty gratifying to see some real quality out there.

Speed Racer wasn't bad either, but the majority didn't agree with me. :(

Mike said...

cmdluke: That's what comic book movies SHOULD be doing. If they can put depth in 22 page monthly pamphlets, how hard can it be to put it in a feature film?

CmdLuke said...

I think thats the problem right there. the monthly books are great. They are written by great writers. These mediocre comic book movies are mostly not written by the people who pen the books. They are adapted by hollywood screenwriters. If we could get some comic book writers to start adapting some of their own material, we may start getting more the quality of TDK, Iron Man, and the Hulk.

Moshe Reuveni said...

I don't think the problem is with the writers. I think the problem is with that regards films as an investment to make money with rather than a work of art.
The math is simple: there are only that many people who are interested in comics, superheroes and such to decide to go and watch a film. However, if you can make the film so that it would appeal to larger audiences - say, by making the film timid enough so kids can watch it and parents can get themselves two hours of peace and quiet - you will have many more potential customers. Who cares if you lose some quality conscious viewers on the way?
Things would change once there's a big enough market out there demanding quality. If it's there it would be identified; there are plenty of marketing companies making their money out of constantly measuring the pulse to identify market segment trends.
The problem of movie studios not releasing enough quality stuff is therefore an indication that the crowds are not that interested in quality.

CmdLuke said...

I see your point, Moshe, but the problem with that theory is, like in the case of Spider-Man 3, it is hyped so that it makes millions whether it is a quality film or not. They make their money in the first few weeks before people know exactly how good the film is. by that time, they we have already given them millions of dollars even though we aren't happy with the quality.

Mike said...

This is a problem.......there are hardly any comic book movies recently that failed to make money, save uber-bombs like Catwoman. I'm hoping that the combination of critical/audience acclaim and record-shattering box office that Dark Knight is doing shows the studio that the sky is the limit when the creative team is as solid as it was on Iron Man and The Dark Knight.

Wicked Little Critta said...

So, we saw The Dark Knight this weekend, and I figured I'd chime in.
First of all, great review. You're right that it feels very long, and I was surprised at the amount of story they tackled. I honestly would have preferred it a bit shorter, but I think because the level of intensity was so high that it was a little exhausting to me.
The acting was phenomenal. Seriously, the entire cast did a great job. Maggie G was good as Rachel, though I didn't think her character did a whole lot. And regarding Heath Ledger: wow.
But it's great to see this kind of quality in this genre, it inspires hope!

CmdLuke said...

I went to see it again in IMAX yesterday. If you haven't seen it in IMAX, its definitely worth a repeat viewing in that format. =)

Neal Paradise said...

i also saw it over the weekend, and i echo all of WLC's sentiments. it was 2 1/2 hours long, but it felt like longer; not because it was boring (it wasn't) or because it dragged (fast-paced throughout), but because there was just so much story crammed into it. because there was just so much to take in, and the subject matter and tone of the film was just so dark, it was a very exhausting experience. it tops the first one by a factor of 3, and is a VERY hard act to follow.

Heath Ledger. oh my goodness, Heath frickin' Ledger. how ironic is it that his last role was also his best? his VERY best? about 10 times better than his 2nd best? i had no idea he had that in him. the Joker transcended regular comic book villains, seeming like a real character. and with him being set in the real world, he goes beyond the archetype of the villain, and transforms into a deeply disturbing person. every time he came on the screen, i felt a little stir in my stomach, like i haven't felt since the first time i saw Hannibal Lecter. watching the Joker wasn't like watching a movie character; it was like being in the presence of a deranged serial killer. unbelievable.

i give it a 20. but when we go see it in IMAX, i don't think i'll see it again until i buy it on DVD, because it just too much to take it.